最近鄙人对这个技术很关注，但是苦于不懂11区语言，所以，看到的相关资料甚少。无论是AEM，还是本站的资料库里都没有对这个技术（这里姑且先用这个词吧）详细的阐述。唯一看到和该技术有关的，是MAHQ里关于高达MKII的介绍。
The main technical advancement introduced with the Mark II was the "movable frame" construction concept. Up until that point, almost all mobile suits were built on the "monocoque" construction concept - with the external armor serving as a "shell" that supported all of the thrusters, joints, hydraulics, fuel tanks, et cetera, that were stored inside. The movable frame concept turned this design philosophy around; the Gundam Mark II was built around a skeleton-like frame, with all thrusters, fuel tanks, weapons and so forth mounted on the frame, and minimal amounts of armor applied to those critical areas that needed protection. With the advent of portable beam weaponry, a mobile suit was typically destroyed with one or two well-placed shots regardless of its armor; therefore, it was decided that otherwise useless armor would be sacrificed for lighter weight - and thus greater speed and maneuverability. When word of the Mark II's development reached the underground Anti-Earth Union Group movement, its leaders decided to move openly to capture one of the prototype mobile suits. Not only would this serve to give the AEUG access to the movable frame technology, but it would allow them to openly prove to the entire Earth Sphere that the Titans - now developing new war technologies - had other plans for the otherwise independent-minded space colonists.
由于这段话太长，鄙人就不全文翻译了，只说说大概。从这段话上来看，在
可动骨架技术出现以前，MS的外装甲要作为一个壳，来支撑推进器，燃料罐，关节，液压管线等等，但是
可动骨架技术出现以后，这些东西都被做到了一个看上去像骨骼一样的结构里面。
那么，从这段话，鄙人有了一个推论，实际上，
可动骨架其实不是一个技术，而是一个设计理念。并且，该设计理念其实也并非很先进。运用
可动骨架和不运用
可动骨架的区别，事实上就好比是现今的汽车是承载性车体还是非承载性车体的区别。只是由于当时的材料科学的限制，在早期没有足够强度的材料来使这种设计理念成为现实。
各位怎么看的。求各位的看法。顺带求相关文献。。。。11区语言的就算了
。。。谢谢各位了。。
[
本帖最后由 fa怪叔叔 于 2008-8-12 18:33 编辑 ]
